TUESDAY MORNING CORP/DE TUEM (last ticker on record)
CIK 878726Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2021 to Mar 2023
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Stinson Leonard Street LLPFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Hallett & Perrin, P.C.First linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 2.06× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Crouch & Hallett, L.L.P.First linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 154 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Stinson Leonard Street LLP | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 46 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.94 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Hallett & Perrin, P.C. | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.70 | 2.06 | 1.25 |
| Crouch & Hallett, L.L.P. | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Pepper Hamilton | May 2021 | Text search only | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eric A. KoontzTroutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- B. Scott GooteeStinson LLPFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- John A. GrandaStinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Robert M. HaywardKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- James S. RoweKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
- THOMAS R. NELSONBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric A. KoontzTroutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| B. Scott GooteeStinson LLP | Dec 2016 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| John A. GrandaStinson Morrison Hecker | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.46 |
| Robert M. HaywardKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 38 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| James S. RoweKirkland & Ellis | Feb 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 2.06 |
| THOMAS R. NELSONBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 7 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 4.29 |