AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INC
CIK 878547Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- ERICKSON & SEDERSTROM, P.C.First linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 2.51× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Stephen M. FlemingFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Grushko & MittmanFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.53× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERICKSON & SEDERSTROM, P.C. | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.42 | 2.51 | 1.25 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Stephen M. Fleming | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 64 | 1.42 | 1.22 | 1.25 |
| Grushko & Mittman | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 103 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 267 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Stephen M. FlemingStephen M. FlemingFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 84 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Darrin M. OcasioSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Eric A. PineroSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 2.55× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 267 | 1.06 | 1.46 | 1.24 |
| Stephen M. FlemingStephen M. Fleming | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 84 | 1.08 | 1.15 | 1.06 |
| Darrin M. OcasioSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.16 | 1.72 | 1.16 |
| Eric A. PineroSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.57 | 2.55 | 0.92 |