NATUS MEDICAL INC NTUS (last ticker on record)
CIK 878526Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Smith AndersonFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jul 2021 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Smith Anderson | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 67 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Luke J. BergstromLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William L. HughesFenwick & West LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Dan WinnikeFenwick & West LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Daniel J. WinnikeFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 2.80× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- Robert P. LattaWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Byron B. KirklandSmith AndersonFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- John W. WhiteCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Julia ReigelWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luke J. BergstromLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William L. HughesFenwick & West LLP | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.12 | 0.94 | 1.37 |
| Dan WinnikeFenwick & West LLP | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Daniel J. WinnikeFenwick & West LLP | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.48 | 2.80 | 1.63 |
| Robert P. LattaWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Byron B. KirklandSmith Anderson | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 9 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| John W. WhiteCravath Swaine & Moore | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 32 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Julia ReigelWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 29 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 0.74 |