Hilltop Securities Holdings LLC SWS (last ticker on record)
CIK 878520Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Winstead PCFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Gardere Wynne Sewell LLPFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Haynes and Boone | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Winstead PC | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 121 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 1.27 |
| Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 117 | 1.13 | 0.97 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Garrett A. DeVriesAkin GumpFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.04×
- BRICE TARZWELLMcAfee & Taft A Professional CorporationFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David R. EarhartGardere Wynne Sewell LLPFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- David G. McLaneGardere Wynne Sewell LLPFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garrett A. DeVriesAkin Gump | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 3.04 |
| BRICE TARZWELLMcAfee & Taft A Professional Corporation | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David R. EarhartGardere Wynne Sewell LLP | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.69 | 0.91 | 1.20 |
| David G. McLaneGardere Wynne Sewell LLP | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.90 |