SALTON INC SFP (last ticker on record)
CIK 878280Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Jan 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Kilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Oct 2008 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLPFirst linked Oct 2008 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Jan 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.21 |
| Kilpatrick Stockton | Oct 2008 | Text search only | 191 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.92 |
| Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP | Oct 2008 | Text search only | 92 | 0.96 | 1.05 | 1.25 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey D. MarellPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Raphael M. RussoPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Bruce A. GutenplanPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey D. MarellPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2008 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Raphael M. RussoPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2008 | Named in a filing | 72 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Bruce A. GutenplanPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.43 |