PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP /MA PRGS (last ticker on record)
CIK 876167Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Oct 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2025 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2025 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| DLA Piper | Nov 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Cooley LLP | Jan 2020 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Goodwin Procter | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Foley Hoag | Dec 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jon VenickDLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Miguel J. VegaCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Anthony J. Medaglia Jr.HUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMARFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John D. HancockFoley HoagFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Robert L. BirnbaumFoley HoagFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 1.48× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- William R. KolbFoley HoagFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Robert W. Sweet Jr.Foley HoagFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 1.94× · 95% wipeout 2.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jon VenickDLA Piper | Nov 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Miguel J. VegaCooley LLP | Jan 2020 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 1.71 | 0.37 | 0.90 |
| Anthony J. Medaglia Jr.HUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMAR | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John D. HancockFoley Hoag | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Robert L. BirnbaumFoley Hoag | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.83 | 1.48 | 0.82 |
| William R. KolbFoley Hoag | Oct 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| Robert W. Sweet Jr.Foley Hoag | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.87 | 1.94 | 2.13 |