INTEGRATED CIRCUIT SYSTEMS INC ICST (last ticker on record)
CIK 874689Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Morgan Lewis | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert A. FriedelPepper HamiltonFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- LANCE C. BALKKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- DAVID R. KINGMorgan LewisFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert A. FriedelPepper Hamilton | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.33 | 1.59 | 1.61 |
| LANCE C. BALKKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.54 | 1.45 | 0.70 |
| DAVID R. KINGMorgan Lewis | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 0.38 |