ADDVANTAGE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INC AEY (last ticker on record)
CIK 874292Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Feb 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2007 to Feb 2024
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C.First linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- CONNOR & WINTERSFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Conner & WintersFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C. | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 1.07 |
| CONNOR & WINTERS | Jan 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Conner & Winters | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 66 | 1.06 | 0.19 | 1.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Del L. GustafsonHall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C.First linked Mar 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Greg S. ScharlauConner & WintersFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Del L. GustafsonHall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C. | Mar 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Greg S. ScharlauConner & Winters | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 1.88 |