Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. SRPT (last ticker on record)
CIK 873303Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- WHITE & LEEFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Ater Wynne LLPFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Ice MillerFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proskauer Rose | Sep 2014 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| WHITE & LEE | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Cooley LLP | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Ater Wynne LLP | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.36 | 0.74 | 0.97 |
| Ice Miller | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 112 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William J. MichenerRopes & GrayFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Christopher D. ComeauRopes & GrayFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Andrea S. RattnerProskauer RoseFirst linked Dec 2018 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul KinsellaRopes & GrayFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Arnold S. JacobsProskauer RoseFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 2.39× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Michael NordtvedtWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Michael C. PhillipsMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Francis R. WheelerCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Kathleen M. WellsLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William J. MichenerRopes & Gray | Mar 2024 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Christopher D. ComeauRopes & Gray | Nov 2019 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Andrea S. RattnerProskauer Rose | Dec 2018 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul KinsellaRopes & Gray | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.70 | 0.39 | 0.66 |
| Arnold S. JacobsProskauer Rose | Sep 2014 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.29 | 2.39 | 1.12 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.35 |
| Michael NordtvedtWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Michael C. PhillipsMorrison & Foerster | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.49 | 0.92 | 0.50 |
| Francis R. WheelerCooley LLP | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.28 | 1.18 | 0.84 |
| Kathleen M. WellsLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 35 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.11 |