PETROQUEST ENERGY INC PQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 872248Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Nov 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Apr 2011 to Apr 2018
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2017 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- GARVEY, SCHUBERT & BARERFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porter & Hedges | Oct 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Apr 2017 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| GARVEY, SCHUBERT & BARER | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 33 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- E. James CowenPorter & HedgesFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Robert G. ReedyPorter & HedgesFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. James CowenPorter & Hedges | Apr 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| Robert G. ReedyPorter & Hedges | Oct 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.86 |