Royal Ahold Delhaize
CIK 869425Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jan 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Dec 2015 · Text search only · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Nov 2015 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Text search only · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Kelley Drye & WarrenFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 152 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Moore & Van AllenFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 131 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Murtha CullinaFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.89× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allen & Overy | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| White & Case | Jan 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Venable LLP | Dec 2015 | Text search only | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Nov 2015 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Linklaters LLP | Nov 2015 | Text search only | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Ballard Spahr | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Kelley Drye & Warren | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 152 | 1.24 | 0.53 | 1.21 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Moore & Van Allen | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 131 | 0.66 | 0.17 | 0.90 |
| Murtha Cullina | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 36 | 1.26 | 0.89 | 1.26 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Winston & Strawn | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sebastian TillerSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alan M. KleinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Laura SizemoreWhite & CaseFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David JohansenWhite & CaseFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Maureen BrundageWhite & CaseFirst linked Jan 1999 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard HallCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Nov 2015 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastian TillerSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2016 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alan M. KleinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Laura SizemoreWhite & Case | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David JohansenWhite & Case | Aug 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Maureen BrundageWhite & Case | Jan 1999 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard HallCravath Swaine & Moore | Nov 2015 | Text search only | 47 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.55 |