WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN INC
CIK 869231Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Kelly Hart & HallmanFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Husch BlackwellFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Stites & HarbisonFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Whiteford Taylor & PrestonFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- White & CaseFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Kelly Hart & Hallman | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 30 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.82 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Husch Blackwell | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 154 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| Stites & Harbison | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 35 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Whiteford Taylor & Preston | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 35 | 1.16 | 0.48 | 1.42 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.11 |
| White & Case | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John C. KennedyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Craig A. AdoorHusch BlackwellFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John C. KennedyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 88 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Craig A. AdoorHusch Blackwell | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 7 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 1.15 |