TELUS CORP TU (last ticker on record)
CIK 868675Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Bennett JonesFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 122 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Farris Vaughan Wills & MurphyFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2003 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.74 |
| Norton Rose | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 305 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.22 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Bennett Jones | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 122 | 1.27 | 0.16 | 1.22 |
| Farris Vaughan Wills & Murphy | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.60 | 1.47 | 0.95 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.79 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2003 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew J. FoleyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Richard B. AftanasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Phyllis G. KorffSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2003 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew J. FoleyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 0.46 | 0.77 | 0.78 |
| Richard B. AftanasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 91 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Phyllis G. KorffSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2003 | Named in a filing | 50 | 1.53 | 0.58 | 1.13 |