ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING INC EFII (last ticker on record)

CIK 867374Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
Restructuring
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Apr 2008
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 10; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 11; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Jul 23, 2019Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 21, 2017Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 24, 2017Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 23, 2008Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 28, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 17, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 22, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 18, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 7, 2007Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 23, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 9, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 13, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 17, 2006Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Sidley Austin	Feb 2008	Named in SEC correspondence	1,210	1.30	0.14	0.93
Latham & Watkins LLP	Oct 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
O Melveny & Myers LLP	Aug 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	589	1.07	0.25	1.07
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Jun 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	1,468	1.09	0.60	1.42
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.	Mar 2003	Named in a filing	995	1.46	0.37	0.80
Morgan Lewis	Feb 2003	Named in a filing	1,028	1.18	0.31	1.02
Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP	Nov 2000	Named in a filing	350	1.17	0.81	1.52
Cooley LLP	Sep 1996	Named in SEC correspondence	1,634	0.71	0.44	1.24
Potter Anderson & Corroon	Mar 2003	Text search only	127	1.41	0.45	0.87
Thelen Reid & Priest	Mar 2003	Text search only	124	0.98	1.16	1.20

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Dan ClivnerSidley Austin	Jul 2019	Named in a filing	5	0.00	0.00	0.00
Vijay S. SekhonSidley Austin	Jul 2019	Named in a filing	8	2.70	0.00	0.97
Warren T. LazarowO Melveny & Myers LLP	Aug 2011	Named in a filing	32	1.24	0.64	1.02
Kathleen M. WellsLatham & Watkins LLP	May 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	35	0.86	0.00	1.11
Timothy R. CurryO Melveny & Myers LLP	Aug 2006	Named in a filing	15	1.56	1.35	0.66
Aaron J. AlterWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Jun 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	46	0.59	1.05	1.11
Robert A. KoenigLatham & Watkins LLP	Sep 2003	Named in SEC correspondence	20	1.05	0.00	0.41
John F. HartiganMorgan Lewis	Aug 2003	Named in a filing	5	0.00	0.00	1.72
RICHARD S. CHERNICOFFBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP	Sep 2001	Named in a filing	6	0.97	0.00	0.00
Brett D. WhiteCooley LLP	Aug 1999	Named in a filing	55	0.27	0.84	0.97
Andrei M. ManoliuCooley LLP	Sep 1996	Named in SEC correspondence	15	0.52	1.20	0.61