POLYMET MINING CORP PLM (last ticker on record)
CIK 866028Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- May 2006 to Jun 2023
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked Sep 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Farris LLPFirst linked Aug 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Farris Vaughan Wills & MurphyFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McCarthy Tetrault | Sep 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.41 |
| Farris LLP | Aug 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jul 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Feb 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 154 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Farris Vaughan Wills & Murphy | Aug 2009 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.60 | 1.47 | 0.99 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Art S. IbradoFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.94×
- Joseph WalshTroutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Henry I. RothmanTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Art S. Ibrado | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.94 |
| Joseph WalshTroutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.53 | 1.66 | 1.28 |
| Henry I. RothmanTroutman Sanders LLP | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 1.11 |