CASCADE BANCORP CACB (last ticker on record)
CIK 865911Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Luse Gorman, PCFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in a filing · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.21×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luse Gorman, PC | Apr 2017 | Named in a filing | 301 | 0.58 | 0.06 | 0.21 |
| Hunton & Williams | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Stoel Rives | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kimberly J. SchaeferVorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Steven M. HaasHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David R. WilsonHeller EhrmanFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Michael C. PhillipsMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimberly J. SchaeferVorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Steven M. HaasHunton & Williams | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David R. WilsonHeller Ehrman | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.00 | 1.29 | 1.56 |
| Michael C. PhillipsMorrison & Foerster | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.49 | 0.92 | 0.50 |