SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO SDO (last ticker on record)
CIK 86521Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Lathan & WatkinsFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayer Brown | Sep 2013 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| Lathan & Watkins | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Brown & Wood | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.56 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael E. SullivanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Gregory P. RodgersLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Barry M. ClarksonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 2.46× · 95% wipeout 2.80×
- Paul C. PringleSidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 2.65× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael E. SullivanLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Gregory P. RodgersLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Barry M. ClarksonLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.26 | 2.46 | 2.80 |
| Paul C. PringleSidley Austin | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 12 | 1.69 | 2.65 | 0.00 |