CASCADE MICROTECH INC CSCD (last ticker on record)
CIK 864559Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2016 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Ater Wynne LLPFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | May 2016 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Perkins Coie | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Ater Wynne LLP | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.36 | 0.74 | 0.97 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Danielle BenderlyPerkins CoieFirst linked May 2013 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- David MathesonPerkins CoieFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Roy W. TuckerPerkins CoieFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gregory E. StruxnessAter Wynne LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danielle BenderlyPerkins Coie | May 2013 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.65 | 1.26 | 0.91 |
| David MathesonPerkins Coie | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Roy W. TuckerPerkins Coie | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gregory E. StruxnessAter Wynne LLP | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 0.79 |