COMMAND SECURITY CORP MOC (last ticker on record)
CIK 864509Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winston & Strawn | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.01 |
| Akin Gump | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.18 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.13 |
| Mayer Brown | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| Bracewell LLP | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David A. SakowitzWinston & StrawnFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Elliott M. SmithWhite & CaseFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- ANDREW HULSHBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 2.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David A. SakowitzWinston & Strawn | Feb 2019 | Named in a filing | 47 | 0.36 | 0.88 | 1.15 |
| Elliott M. SmithWhite & Case | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 1.26 | 0.51 | 1.10 |
| ANDREW HULSHBaker & McKenzie | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.69 | 1.18 | 2.35 |