Omni Shrimp, Inc. OMSH (last ticker on record)
CIK 863895Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Krieger & PragerFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 2.16× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- David Lubin & Associates, PLLCFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 100 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.52× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Krieger & Prager | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 0.90 | 2.16 | 1.69 |
| David Lubin & Associates, PLLC | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 100 | 1.05 | 1.52 | 1.09 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Nixon Peabody | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Samuel M. KriegerKrieger & PragerFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
- David LubinDavid Lubin & Associates, PLLCFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in a filing · 267 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- William E. KellyNixon PeabodyFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.20× · Went dark 2.32× · 95% wipeout 3.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samuel M. KriegerKrieger & Prager | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.16 | 2.27 | 1.66 |
| David LubinDavid Lubin & Associates, PLLC | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 110 | 0.96 | 1.61 | 1.09 |
| Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Dec 2007 | Named in a filing | 267 | 1.06 | 1.46 | 1.24 |
| William E. KellyNixon Peabody | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 3.20 | 2.32 | 3.15 |