ADAM INC ADAM (last ticker on record)
CIK 863650Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLPFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 92 | 0.96 | 1.05 | 1.20 |
| King & Spalding | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arthur Jay SchwartzSmith, Gambrell & Russell, LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.79× · Went dark 3.93× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Jon H. KlapperSmith, Gambrell & Russell, LLPFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.57× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- STACEY K. GEERKing & SpaldingFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.57×
- William G. RocheKing & SpaldingFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur Jay SchwartzSmith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.79 | 3.93 | 1.32 |
| Jon H. KlapperSmith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.57 | 1.93 | 0.00 |
| STACEY K. GEERKing & Spalding | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 4.57 |
| William G. RocheKing & Spalding | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 2.73 |