GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC GVA (last ticker on record)
CIK 861459Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Stinson Leonard Street LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Jones DayFirst linked Feb 2018 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winston & Strawn | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| DLA Piper | Jun 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Stinson Leonard Street LLP | Mar 2018 | Text search only | 46 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.94 |
| Jones Day | Feb 2018 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles T. HaagWinston & StrawnFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Justin S. ReinusWinston & StrawnFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
- Alain DermarkarShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- James E. O BannonAllen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 135 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- DENNIS C. SULLIVANDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Peter D. LyonsShearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles T. HaagWinston & Strawn | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
| Justin S. ReinusWinston & Strawn | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 1.88 |
| Alain DermarkarShearman & Sterling | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| James E. O BannonAllen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 135 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| DENNIS C. SULLIVANDLA Piper | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 1.71 |
| Peter D. LyonsShearman & Sterling | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.35 |