RYLAND GROUP INC RYL (last ticker on record)
CIK 85974Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Oct 2015 · Named in a filing · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snell & Wilmer | Oct 2015 | Named in a filing | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Aug 2015 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Ropes & Gray | Aug 2015 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| DLA Piper | Jan 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Piper Rudnick | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey E. BeckSnell & Wilmer | Oct 2015 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.82 |