RYDER SYSTEM INC R (last ticker on record)
CIK 85961Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked May 2016 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Morgan Lewis | May 2016 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Holland & Knight | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 413 | 1.16 | 0.82 | 1.21 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Alan SingerMorgan LewisFirst linked May 2016 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- Kara L. MacCulloughGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 2.41× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Todd R. ChandlerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Flora R. PerezGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- John W. WhiteCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- William P. Rogers Jr.Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Alan SingerMorgan Lewis | May 2016 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| Kara L. MacCulloughGreenberg Traurig | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.55 | 2.41 | 0.75 |
| Todd R. ChandlerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 38 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Flora R. PerezGreenberg Traurig | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| John W. WhiteCravath Swaine & Moore | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 32 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| William P. Rogers Jr.Cravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 0.88 |