AVANIR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AVNR (last ticker on record)
CIK 858803Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked May 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Ropes & Gray | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Heller Ehrman | May 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Dec 1995 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Reed Smith | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- David M. WheelerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- R. Scott SheanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Lisa M. KahleRopes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Ryan A. MurrGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Stephen C. FerruoloHeller EhrmanFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- ALAN JACOBSHeller EhrmanFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Amar BudarapuBaker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.84× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- John J. HentrichSheppard MullinFirst linked Jan 1996 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.09× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 2.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 74 | 1.30 | 0.35 | 0.69 |
| David M. WheelerLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| R. Scott SheanLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.95 | 0.74 | 0.78 |
| Lisa M. KahleRopes & Gray | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Ryan A. MurrGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 77 | 0.53 | 0.77 | 0.66 |
| Stephen C. FerruoloHeller Ehrman | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ALAN JACOBSHeller Ehrman | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Amar BudarapuBaker & McKenzie | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 2.84 | 1.29 |
| John J. HentrichSheppard Mullin | Jan 1996 | Named in a filing | 16 | 2.09 | 0.80 | 2.39 |