RUSSELL CORP RML (last ticker on record)
CIK 85812Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Bradley Arant Rose & WhiteFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alston & Bird | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 110 | 1.07 | 0.53 | 1.03 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Bradley Arant Rose & White | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nancy A. LiebermanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Stacy J. KanterSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- JOHN K. MOLENBradley Arant Rose & WhiteFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nancy A. LiebermanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 2.52 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Stacy J. KanterSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 73 | 1.60 | 0.31 | 0.62 |
| JOHN K. MOLENBradley Arant Rose & White | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |