GTECH HOLDINGS CORP GTK (last ticker on record)
CIK 857323Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Taft Stettinius & HollisterFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Edwards & AngellFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Drinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 213 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taft Stettinius & Hollister | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 94 | 1.64 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| Edwards & Angell | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 81 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 1.15 |
| Drinker Biddle & Reath | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 213 | 1.46 | 0.77 | 1.25 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eugene W. McDermott Jr.Locke LordFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- LAURA N. WILKINSONEdwards & AngellFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eugene W. McDermott Jr.Locke Lord | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| LAURA N. WILKINSONEdwards & Angell | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 0.59 |