GEHL CO GEHL (last ticker on record)
CIK 856386Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Foley & Lardner | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark T. PlichtaFoley & LardnerFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Benjamin F. Garmer IIIFoley & LardnerFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Ethan A. KlingsbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.14× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Jay O. RothmanFoley & LardnerFirst linked May 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Jason M. HilleFoley & LardnerFirst linked Oct 2008 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Neil R. MarkelCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2008 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Peter D. FetzerFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark T. PlichtaFoley & Lardner | Oct 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 0.46 |
| Benjamin F. Garmer IIIFoley & Lardner | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Ethan A. KlingsbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 2.14 | 0.84 | 1.27 |
| Jay O. RothmanFoley & Lardner | May 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Jason M. HilleFoley & Lardner | Oct 2008 | Text search only | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Neil R. MarkelCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Oct 2008 | Text search only | 14 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Peter D. FetzerFoley & Lardner | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 26 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.40 |