SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY INC SSTI (last ticker on record)
CIK 855906Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Jul 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John T. McKennaCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Laura M. MedinaCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Vincent P. PangrazioCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Matthew W. SonsiniCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Mark P. TanouryCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. McKennaCooley LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 1.10 |
| Laura M. MedinaCooley LLP | Jan 2005 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Vincent P. PangrazioCooley LLP | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.48 | 1.49 | 1.29 |
| Matthew W. SonsiniCooley LLP | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Mark P. TanouryCooley LLP | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.42 | 0.54 | 1.20 |