LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP LSCC (last ticker on record)
CIK 855658Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Oct 1995 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fenwick & West LLP | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Perkins Coie | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Oct 1995 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Davis Polk | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Amanda N. UrquizaWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2023 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Tony JeffriesWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- David K. MichaelsFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Thomas J. IveySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.10×
- Danielle BenderlyPerkins CoieFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Michael S. RussellWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Oct 1995 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda N. UrquizaWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2023 | Named in a filing | 12 | 3.69 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Tony JeffriesWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2021 | Named in a filing | 50 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| David K. MichaelsFenwick & West LLP | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 64 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Thomas J. IveySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 2.10 |
| Danielle BenderlyPerkins Coie | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.65 | 1.26 | 0.91 |
| Michael S. RussellWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Oct 1995 | Named in a filing | 56 | 1.86 | 1.00 | 1.20 |