XRS Corp XRSC (last ticker on record)
CIK 854398Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Messerli & Kramer P.A.First linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- MOSS & BARNETTFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Feb 2013 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Faegre & Benson | Aug 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Messerli & Kramer P.A. | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.64 | 1.65 | 1.40 |
| MOSS & BARNETT | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Baker & Daniels | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua L. ColburnFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- John A. HavemanFaegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Michael K. CoddingtonFaegre & BensonFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Erik J. RomsloFaegre & BensonFirst linked May 2009 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua L. ColburnFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| John A. HavemanFaegre Baker Daniels | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Michael K. CoddingtonFaegre & Benson | Aug 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Erik J. RomsloFaegre & Benson | May 2009 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |