K&F INDUSTRIES INC
CIK 851797Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- O'Sullivan Graev & KarabellFirst linked Nov 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Willkie Farr | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| O'Sullivan Graev & Karabell | Nov 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.19 | 0.58 | 1.70 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bruce D. MeyerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Timothy J. HartGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Neil NovikoffWillkie FarrFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- JOHN J. SUYDAMO'Sullivan Graev & KarabellFirst linked Nov 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruce D. MeyerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Timothy J. HartGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Neil NovikoffWillkie Farr | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| JOHN J. SUYDAMO'Sullivan Graev & Karabell | Nov 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.89 |