LAS VEGAS SANDS, LLC
CIK 850994Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lionel Sawyer & CollinsFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 128 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Gibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 1,126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lionel Sawyer & Collins | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 128 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 1.00 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Gibson Dunn & Crutcher | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 1,126 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.95 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Smith IncorporatedShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 597 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- John C. KennedyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- National Corporate ResearchFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smith IncorporatedShearman & Sterling | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 597 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| John C. KennedyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 88 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| National Corporate Research | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 25 | 0.74 | 1.15 | 1.24 |