Victor Technologies Group, Inc. THMD (last ticker on record)
CIK 850660Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Armstrong TeasdaleFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Husch BlackwellFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Thompson CoburnFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- White & CaseFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryan Cave | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Armstrong Teasdale | Apr 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 64 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | May 2011 | Text search only | 110 | 1.07 | 0.53 | 1.03 |
| Husch Blackwell | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 154 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Thompson Coburn | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 85 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.33 |
| White & Case | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- R. Randall WangBryan CaveFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Todd M. KayeBryan CaveFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- David W. BraswellArmstrong TeasdaleFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- JOHN L. GILLIS JR.Armstrong TeasdaleFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
- R. SCOTT COHENWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Todd R. ChandlerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- William F. SeabaughBryan CaveFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Matthew J. GilroyWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. Randall WangBryan Cave | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Todd M. KayeBryan Cave | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| David W. BraswellArmstrong Teasdale | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| JOHN L. GILLIS JR.Armstrong Teasdale | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| R. SCOTT COHENWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Todd R. ChandlerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 38 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| William F. SeabaughBryan Cave | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 6 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Matthew J. GilroyWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 31 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.45 |