SAFENET INC SFNT (last ticker on record)
CIK 850313Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Nov 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Venable LLP | Aug 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael J. KennedyShearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Steve L. CamahortShearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Mark GordonWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Michael W. ConronVenable LLPFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Elizabeth R. HughesVenable LLPFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Glenn M. ReiterSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.04×
- Michael NathanSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J. KennedyShearman & Sterling | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 20 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Steve L. CamahortShearman & Sterling | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Mark GordonWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Michael W. ConronVenable LLP | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 9 | 4.24 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Elizabeth R. HughesVenable LLP | Aug 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.13 | 0.81 | 1.26 |
| Glenn M. ReiterSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 12 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 2.04 |
| Michael NathanSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 23 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 0.52 |