FOOT LOCKER, INC. FL (last ticker on record)
CIK 850209Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2025 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2025 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.74 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David C. KarpWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2025 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- David J. GoldschmidtSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Thomas H. KennedySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David C. KarpWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2025 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| David J. GoldschmidtSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 74 | 1.03 | 0.58 | 1.27 |
| Thomas H. KennedySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.39 |