Gen Digital Inc. GEN (last ticker on record)
CIK 849399Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Dec 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 21
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Nov 1995 · Named in a filing · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 1995 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Sep 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Heller Ehrman | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Nov 1995 | Named in a filing | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 1995 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Jan 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Justin HoOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Oct 2024 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- Douglas N. CogenFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.20×
- William L. HughesFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- David K. MichaelsFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- William H. Hinman Jr.Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Andrew Y. LuhFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Cynthia E. GarabedianFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel J. WinnikeFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 2.80× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- Richard A. PeersHeller EhrmanFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.24×
- Craig E. ChasonPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- John M. McDonaldShaw PittmanFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David A. BellFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Gordon K. DavidsonFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 1999 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- JEFFERY L. DONOVANFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.75×
- C. Kevin KelsoFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Oct 1995 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.18× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- IAIN MICKLEOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jan 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Sophia HudsonDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2025 · Text search only · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Carlo ZenknerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2021 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Edward J. LeeWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2021 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kirsten JensenSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin HoOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Oct 2024 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 2.07 |
| Douglas N. CogenFenwick & West LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.20 |
| William L. HughesFenwick & West LLP | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.12 | 0.94 | 1.37 |
| David K. MichaelsFenwick & West LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 64 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| William H. Hinman Jr.Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 39 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Andrew Y. LuhFenwick & West LLP | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Cynthia E. GarabedianFenwick & West LLP | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Daniel J. WinnikeFenwick & West LLP | Jan 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.48 | 2.80 | 1.63 |
| Richard A. PeersHeller Ehrman | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 2.24 |
| Craig E. ChasonPillsbury Winthrop | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| John M. McDonaldShaw Pittman | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David A. BellFenwick & West LLP | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Gordon K. DavidsonFenwick & West LLP | Jan 1999 | Named in a filing | 67 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| JEFFERY L. DONOVANFenwick & West LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 2.75 |
| C. Kevin KelsoFenwick & West LLP | Oct 1995 | Named in a filing | 10 | 3.18 | 1.66 | 1.61 |
| IAIN MICKLEOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jan 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Sophia HudsonDavis Polk | Feb 2025 | Text search only | 28 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Carlo ZenknerKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2021 | Text search only | 9 | 1.47 | — | 1.41 |
| Edward J. LeeWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2021 | Text search only | 21 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kirsten JensenSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 9 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 56 | 1.86 | 1.00 | 1.20 |