ACE CASH EXPRESS INC/TX AACE (last ticker on record)
CIK 849116Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Gardere Wynne Sewell LLPFirst linked Aug 1998 · Named in a filing · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Hughes & LuceFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 2.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP | Aug 1998 | Named in a filing | 117 | 1.13 | 0.97 | 1.24 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Akin Gump | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Hughes & Luce | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 58 | 1.25 | 0.58 | 2.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert W. PhillipsCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Robert B. PincusSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- John M. NewellLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- MICHAEL A. SASLAWWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert W. PhillipsCooley LLP | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.67 | 1.05 | 1.02 |
| Robert B. PincusSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2006 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| John M. NewellLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| MICHAEL A. SASLAWWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 18 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.57 |