ALLION HEALTHCARE INC ALLI (last ticker on record)
CIK 847935Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Gusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Winstead PCFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alston & Bird | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Gusrae Kaplan & Bruno | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 76 | 0.60 | 1.31 | 0.89 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Perkins Coie | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Winstead PC | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 121 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 1.27 |
| Nixon Peabody | May 2005 | Text search only | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael H. WeedKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James S. RoweKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
- Sarah E. ErnstAlston & BirdFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Andrew HermanKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Steven L. PottleAlston & BirdFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Jeremy D. GlaserCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Lawrence G. NusbaumGusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 1.57× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael H. WeedKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2009 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James S. RoweKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 2.06 |
| Sarah E. ErnstAlston & Bird | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Andrew HermanKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Steven L. PottleAlston & Bird | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Jeremy D. GlaserCooley LLP | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 18 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Lawrence G. NusbaumGusrae Kaplan & Bruno | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 46 | 0.99 | 1.57 | 0.70 |