ASCONI CORP ACD (last ticker on record)
CIK 847917Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- VANDERKAM & SANDERSFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 1.83× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| VANDERKAM & SANDERS | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 23 | 2.07 | 1.83 | 0.40 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gerald ChizeverLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Jeffery A. BahnsenFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 3.43× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerald ChizeverLoeb & Loeb LLP | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.72 | 1.71 | 0.71 |
| Jeffery A. Bahnsen | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.10 | 3.43 | 0.00 |