IdentiPHI, Inc. IDPI (last ticker on record)
CIK 847555Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2000 to Feb 2009
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Rutan & TuckerFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Kaye ScholerFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutan & Tucker | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 60 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 1.08 |
| DLA Piper | Jul 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Kaye Scholer | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 161 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| Venable LLP | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Piper Rudnick | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W. Michael HutchingsDLA Piper | Jan 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.59 | 0.96 | 0.00 |