NEW FRONTIER MEDIA INC NOOF (last ticker on record)
CIK 847383Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Holland & HartFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Lehman & Eilen LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 2.25× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Dinsmore & ShohlFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 96 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Littman KrooksFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alston & Bird | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Holland & Hart | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Lehman & Eilen LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 34 | 1.23 | 2.25 | 0.64 |
| Dinsmore & Shohl | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 96 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.64 |
| Littman Krooks | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 32 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 2.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Keith E. GottfriedMorgan LewisFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Scott A. BerdanHolland & HartFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keith E. GottfriedMorgan Lewis | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.08 | 1.18 | 0.70 |
| Scott A. BerdanHolland & Hart | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 77 | 0.66 | 2.28 | 1.53 |