SMITH & NEPHEW PLC SNN (last ticker on record)
CIK 845982Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Slaughter and MayFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Ashurst LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slaughter and May | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Ashurst LLP | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Davis Polk | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Sidley Austin | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Connie MilonakisDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Veronica M. WisselDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- John B. MeadeDavis PolkFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Julia CowlesDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connie MilonakisDavis Polk | Mar 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 |
| Veronica M. WisselDavis Polk | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| John B. MeadeDavis Polk | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Julia CowlesDavis Polk | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 12 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 1.69 |