ROCHESTER & PITTSBURGH COAL CO
CIK 84548Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Buchanan Ingersoll Professional CorporationFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Steptoe & JohnsonFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked May 2003 · Text search only · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 123 | 1.14 | 0.73 | 1.34 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.10 |
| Steptoe & Johnson | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 80 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 1.37 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.06 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | May 2003 | Text search only | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.80 |
| Piper Rudnick | May 2002 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2002 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lewis U. Davis Jr.Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 12 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 1.13 |