Centric Brands Inc. CTRC (last ticker on record)
CIK 844143Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began May 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2018 to Oct 2020
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- White & CaseFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- SIMS MOSS KLINE & DAVIS LLPFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.49× · Went dark 2.87× · 95% wipeout 2.70×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Mar 1996 · Named in a filing · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Nov 2015 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2015 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dechert LLP | Aug 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| White & Case | Nov 2016 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Akin Gump | Apr 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| SIMS MOSS KLINE & DAVIS LLP | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.49 | 2.87 | 2.70 |
| Holland & Knight | Mar 1996 | Named in a filing | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Nov 2015 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2015 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2015 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Russell W. Parks Jr.Akin GumpFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.40×
- Paul A. BelvinAkin GumpFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.80× · 95% wipeout 3.16×
- Bruce S. MendelsohnAkin GumpFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Jeffrey H. CohenSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Patrick S. BrownSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2015 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Russell W. Parks Jr.Akin Gump | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 3.40 |
| Paul A. BelvinAkin Gump | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.19 | 1.80 | 3.16 |
| Bruce S. MendelsohnAkin Gump | Apr 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Jeffrey H. CohenSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2015 | Text search only | 22 | 1.47 | 0.93 | 0.84 |
| Patrick S. BrownSullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2015 | Text search only | 37 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.18 |