LEAR CORP LEA (last ticker on record)
CIK 842162Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jul 2026 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jan 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jul 2026 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Winston & Strawn | Jan 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Baker & McKenzie | May 2002 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lillian BrownWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jul 2026 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Meredith B. CrossWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jul 2026 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.44×
- Molly W. FoxWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jul 2026 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.19×
- Christina T. RoupasCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Brian M. SchaferWinston & StrawnFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Robert W. EricsonWinston & StrawnFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- John L. MacCarthyWinston & StrawnFirst linked Mar 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- Bruce A. TothWinston & StrawnFirst linked Jan 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Jeffrey D. MarellPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lillian BrownWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jul 2026 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Meredith B. CrossWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jul 2026 | Named in a filing | 33 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 2.44 |
| Molly W. FoxWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jul 2026 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 2.19 |
| Christina T. RoupasCooley LLP | Aug 2017 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Brian M. SchaferWinston & Strawn | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Robert W. EricsonWinston & Strawn | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| John L. MacCarthyWinston & Strawn | Mar 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 3.61 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| Bruce A. TothWinston & Strawn | Jan 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 75 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Jeffrey D. MarellPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 54 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.94 |