NEW RITE AID, LLC RAD (last ticker on record)
CIK 84129Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Oct 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2015 to Dec 2023
- Law firms
- 16
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in a filing · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Chapman and CutlerFirst linked May 2003 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Day Berry & HowardFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- H. DAVID HENKENFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.25×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- RAY, QUINNEY & NEBEKERFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- SWIDLER & BERLIN, CHARTEREDFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.75× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Jun 2018 | Named in a filing | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Morgan Lewis | Nov 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Chapman and Cutler | May 2003 | Text search only | 95 | 1.17 | 0.32 | 0.93 |
| Akin Gump | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Day Berry & Howard | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 61 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 0.81 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| H. DAVID HENKEN | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 10 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 3.25 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| RAY, QUINNEY & NEBEKER | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 22 | 2.04 | 1.33 | 1.74 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| SWIDLER & BERLIN, CHARTERED | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 78 | 0.98 | 1.75 | 1.36 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Marie L. GibsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Laura KaufmannSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Marc S. GerberSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Michael J. ZeidelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Robert A. ProfusekJones DayFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Nancy A. LiebermanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Stacy J. KanterSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- H. David HenkenGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marie L. GibsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| Laura KaufmannSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Marc S. GerberSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Michael J. ZeidelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Robert A. ProfusekJones Day | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Nancy A. LiebermanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 2.52 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Stacy J. KanterSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 73 | 1.60 | 0.31 | 0.62 |
| H. David HenkenGoodwin Procter | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 15 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 2.29 |