DORAL FINANCIAL CORP DRL (last ticker on record)
CIK 840889Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Mar 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Pietrantoni Mendez & AlvarezFirst linked Nov 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Aug 2009 · Text search only · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Brown & Wood | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez | Nov 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Seward & Kissel | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Dewey Ballantine | Aug 2009 | Text search only | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Helena K. GrannisCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Leslie N. SilvermanCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Max KirchnerPaul HastingsFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Arjun KoshalSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Victor I. LewkowCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.27×
- Donald C. WalkovikSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Anthony Tu-SekineSeward & KisselFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Ellen PattersonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert E. LustrinSeward & KisselFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 3.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena K. GrannisCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 3.15 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Leslie N. SilvermanCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Max KirchnerPaul Hastings | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 3.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Arjun KoshalSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Victor I. LewkowCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 0.27 |
| Donald C. WalkovikSullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 10 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Anthony Tu-SekineSeward & Kissel | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 13 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Ellen PattersonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 5 | 2.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert E. LustrinSeward & Kissel | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 40 | 1.29 | 0.55 | 3.08 |