BTU INTERNATIONAL INC BTUI (last ticker on record)
CIK 840883Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pierce AtwoodFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.23×
- Brown RudnickFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pierce Atwood | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| Brown Rudnick | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 137 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.97 |
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Ropes & Gray | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Timothy C. MaguireTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Jocelyn M. ArelGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Michael S. TurnerGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Keith F. HigginsRopes & GrayFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Paul KinsellaRopes & GrayFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timothy C. MaguireTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Jocelyn M. ArelGoodwin Procter | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 63 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Michael S. TurnerGoodwin Procter | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 10 | 2.04 | 1.54 | 0.99 |
| Keith F. HigginsRopes & Gray | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Paul KinsellaRopes & Gray | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.70 | 0.39 | 0.66 |