Aphton CORP APHT (last ticker on record)
CIK 840319Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2004 to Jun 2006
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Ballantine | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.87 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
| White & Case | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Akerman LLP | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kara L. MacCulloughGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 2.41× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Jonathan E. KahnWhite & CaseFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 4.64× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
- Timothy B. GoodellWhite & CaseFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kara L. MacCulloughGreenberg Traurig | Jun 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.55 | 2.41 | 0.81 |
| Jonathan E. KahnWhite & Case | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 4.64 | 2.06 |
| Timothy B. GoodellWhite & Case | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 1.59 | 0.81 |